Reboot
On Sunday I decided that the running season 2011 definitely needs a reboot. After I dragged over the lack of motivation that is successful in the new year, I have always talked out in January for not running found: too tired, too late, too wet, too cold, too smooth to do too much .....
Besides the lack of motivation, I have also imported the irrepressible candy consumption from the holiday season into January. Together with one point absolutely deplorable aberration, especially because the first slow stretch pants again.
So I decided on Sunday that this has to change again, and now are no more excuses. And since I was now running again and has even been fun and I motivated it was, I want a few tips for a successful reboot share:
yield 1) As long as the bastard until the conscience is so bad that It is simply no other way
2) make that change right now, what needs to occur immediately in the ass and start running.
3) take immediately after the season planning framework: HM at 26.6, M at 9.10..
4) concrete plans: training schedules out looking. Start date of the plan are calculated (including training plans usually 10-12 weeks). With the other fixed points in match (and thereby find that everything fits perfectly ideal for the holiday planning)
5) is run again and continue this dream in the mind of the best times.
So I am determined to leave Florida lay the foundations to get started on their return to the HM training. After inserting the HM recovery phase, which includes the MeckPom stay, start after returning to training for a marathon.
So on we go. Phase 1 is already running ....
Guats Nächtle
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
Saturday, February 5, 2011
Meaning On Letterman Jackets
New Flyer: Stuttgart 21: More threats - less security
I have created a new flyer with safety counter-arguments to S21. It contains some of the arguments of the flyer the info campaign (see posting dated February 2). It also contains other security flaws that I have worked out in discussions with track specialists.
To print these arguments collection easily colored, I imagine the same as a pdf-file:
Flyer on two sides, well suited for distributing On 4! March again substantially revised. New: safety gallery image with the years that the long-term persistence of the DB poor safety characteristics document.
, you can also your neighbors who may not know what to think about S21 to inform with facts! It is best to assume for this discussion, the same new and much improved brochure of the "Life in Stuttgart - Stuttgart No 21". This counter-arguments with images on 64 pages can be found!
I have created a new flyer with safety counter-arguments to S21. It contains some of the arguments of the flyer the info campaign (see posting dated February 2). It also contains other security flaws that I have worked out in discussions with track specialists.
To print these arguments collection easily colored, I imagine the same as a pdf-file:
Flyer on two sides, well suited for distributing On 4! March again substantially revised. New: safety gallery image with the years that the long-term persistence of the DB poor safety characteristics document.
, you can also your neighbors who may not know what to think about S21 to inform with facts! It is best to assume for this discussion, the same new and much improved brochure of the "Life in Stuttgart - Stuttgart No 21". This counter-arguments with images on 64 pages can be found!
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
How To Put A Head On A Different Body
New structure of the 60 counter-arguments
The chosen structure of the counter-arguments A, B, C. .. the geographical location of the problem seems no longer useful. I'm thinking about a new structure from the view of rail passengers. Meanwhile, problems with S21 could be organized in the following:
I Security: Where threaten hazards where there is danger?.
Umsteigekomfort II: Here are nenen the problems that result from the main station to a few tracks, and the problem is that there will be two stations at the airport.
III schedule problems Through the many bottlenecks to the DB does not succeed, a stable, to create robust against delay schedule. Here you can classify all the arguments arising from the planned track structure.
But it will take some days until the new structure is. Other
structuring proposals are welcome. There are the - unused so far - comments.
Here is a current link to a flyer about safety, has compiled the information campaign with the participation of engineers to S21:
02/11/2011: Here is a publication of transport experts with 10 traffic-related problems and a statement of S21 Plus: link to the passenger
The chosen structure of the counter-arguments A, B, C. .. the geographical location of the problem seems no longer useful. I'm thinking about a new structure from the view of rail passengers. Meanwhile, problems with S21 could be organized in the following:
I Security: Where threaten hazards where there is danger?.
Umsteigekomfort II: Here are nenen the problems that result from the main station to a few tracks, and the problem is that there will be two stations at the airport.
III schedule problems Through the many bottlenecks to the DB does not succeed, a stable, to create robust against delay schedule. Here you can classify all the arguments arising from the planned track structure.
But it will take some days until the new structure is. Other
structuring proposals are welcome. There are the - unused so far - comments.
Here is a current link to a flyer about safety, has compiled the information campaign with the participation of engineers to S21:
Stuttgart 21 subway station: "security" is lowercase
(My respect the inventor of the clerical error in the title) 02/11/2011: Here is a publication of transport experts with 10 traffic-related problems and a statement of S21 Plus: link to the passenger
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)